| Title |
Test
Find
Phone Numbers
|
| Expression |
^(1\s*[-\/\.]?)?(\((\d{3})\)|(\d{3}))\s*[-\/\.]?\s*(\d{3})\s*[-\/\.]?\s*(\d{4})\s*(([xX]|[eE][xX][tT])\.?\s*(\d+))*$ |
| Description |
This regular expressions matches phone numbers with area codes and optional US country code and optional phone extension. User have so many ways of entering phone numbers into input fields. This allows for some of the ones I've encountered. Feel free to contact me if you find ones that do not match. |
| Matches |
2405525009 | 1(240) 652-5009 | 240/752-5009 ext.55 |
| Non-Matches |
(2405525009 | 2 (240) 652-5009 |
| Author |
Rating:
Dean Dal Bozzo
|
| Source |
|
| Your Rating |
|
Title: Very good
Name: Jax
Date: 3/24/2015 7:26:33 AM
Comment:
Thanks for the great regex, built on it a little but works great! just a heads up for future development it does not recognise the follow:
- Spaces between digits (some people break up into common formats such as 01784 1...)
- hyphen between the numbers (Netherlands).
Otherwise great 5 stars from me!
Title: Regex for Fax
Name: Pankaj
Date: 5/17/2011 6:48:47 AM
Comment:
hello i want a regular expression for fax which accepts numerics,space,"-","()","+".Can u plz provide it
Title: Slightly improved
Name: Kevin
Date: 1/12/2010 11:36:41 AM
Comment:
I added the +1 option, fixed a bug with the hyphen between the 1 and the area code, and made the extensions more flexible.
^(1\s*[-\/\.]?\s*)?(\((\d{3})\)|(\d{3}))\s*[-\/\.]?\s*(\d{3})\s*[-\/\.]?\s*(\d{4})\s*(([xX]|[eE][xX][tT]?)\.?\s*([#*\d]+))*$
Title: only digits???
Name: Bodia Soryformyenglish:)
Date: 11/28/2009 12:44:44 PM
Comment:
Please add to Matches number "one-one-one";)
Title: optional area codes
Name: Mtimdog
Date: 3/10/2004 2:21:57 PM
Comment:
Does not accept numbers without area code like 333-4444....
Fixed by adding
(....stuff for 1(333) areacode....)? to it
Title: '+1'
Name: Harley
Date: 11/11/2003 9:15:22 PM
Comment:
Does not accept numbers with a + in front of the 1 (as is customary for international codes), such as:
+1 987 654 3210
Easily fixed with the addition of a \+? just before the 1.
Thanks for a great RE!
