Title: Very Goog
Date: 1/27/2016 5:25:57 AM
Thks Life Saver
Title: Require 4 digit year
Date: 6/27/2008 10:48:20 AM
Is there a version that requires 4 digit years? This one seems to accept 2 digit years.
Title: "\ " unrecognised escape sequence
Date: 1/4/2008 4:58:45 AM
I am getting ASP.NEt unrecoginized escape error while compilation
Title: one question
Date: 5/28/2007 6:35:15 PM
09 as yy is 1907 or 2009
and 12 as yy is 1912 or 2012
Title: ASP.NEt unrecoginized escape
Date: 5/23/2006 1:15:41 PM
You need an @ before the regex's to avoid Visual Studio giving you an error.
so RegEx.IsMatch(input, @"...");
Title: Other versions?
Name: Geoff Caylor
Date: 8/9/2004 3:19:06 PM
Hello. Great expression! However, I'm looking for one in a different format? Do you have one, or does any other reader know of one that handles the following formats?
MMDDYY, MMDDYYYY, MM/DD/YY, MM/DD/YYYY
Title: For Mike request
Name: Dany Lauener
Date: 4/13/2004 3:57:44 PM
here it comes.
As I discovered into your email that you do not need DDMMYYYY validation, I removed it... se here :
Title: Extend regexp to handle 1 digit year date
Date: 4/13/2004 9:43:39 AM
Thanks in advance for any help.
Name: Thomas Keegan
Date: 4/1/2004 4:38:50 AM
Excellent, no better word to describe it
Date: 3/11/2004 2:08:59 PM
Name: Michael Ash
Date: 2/19/2004 10:13:27 AM
Here's one in that format.
although it only uses spaces for separators so would still need slight modification
Date: 2/19/2004 9:11:59 AM
I'll do one for you if I have time. It's easy...
I will be longer because not numeric, but whatever...
Date: 2/19/2004 9:07:17 AM
I think this is one of the best regular expressions i have ever seen.
Q: What can be done for this to take dates like: "01-Jan-2003" or: "12-Dec-2004" ... ??
or: 14 Feb 2004
format for .NET is: "dd-MMM-yyyy"
How can this be done?
Title: Doesn't seem to be written for it :)
Date: 12/8/2003 2:28:18 AM
On earth, there's sometimes something strange. A metric system exists, as well as a "logical" way to go from the smallest part to he biggest : days, then months, then years.
With a touch of humour.
Title: Got a problem..
Name: Paul S
Date: 12/5/2003 4:25:23 PM
Doesn't seem to work with 13 or higher in the middle group of digits. For example, 02/12/03 works but 02/13/03 does not.
Date: 12/4/2003 4:04:26 AM
Well-done, and thank you.
Title: Re: Cool, but
Name: Michael Ash
Date: 11/12/2003 9:59:13 AM
Here is one in MM/DD/YYYY format
Title: Cool, but..
Date: 11/11/2003 1:36:57 PM
Can someone please convert this regexp to handle MMDDYYYY instead of DDMMYYYY?
Date: 10/30/2003 5:10:28 AM
Does anyone know how to convert the expressions so i dont get the unrecognized escape sequence error. When i copy them into a string i currently i have the error saying unrecognized escape sequence.
Date: 10/30/2003 4:47:01 AM
That reg ex is fantastic... It works so nicely and is extremely extensive... EXCELLENT WORK my good man
Title: Jakarta regexp
Name: Dany Lauener
Date: 9/26/2003 3:08:13 AM
try to replace
you can find docs about regexp in jakarta here :
or java help here:
Please, note that this regexp should be java compliant.
Note also the "red" issues of jakarta.
Hope this helps.
Title: True coder spirit shown
Date: 9/20/2003 7:12:26 AM
Thank you for this extremely useful regex. I'm a CTO in a software company, where the pressure hits the roof every day and have no time to sit down and create an expression like this. I'm going to use it in a high profile app for a Scandinavian company. You have already been credited.
Title: Your welcome
Date: 9/16/2003 8:51:39 AM
Your welcome guys !
The secret is to separate your expression into very simple working (and 100% tested) regexp, and then respect the logical way to construct a bigger one, and so on...
If you wan, I've got a file with separated expressions (basic month validator, for example, then day validator, then leap year, then non leap year, etc...)
send me a mail.
Title: Cool - at last the one that seems to work in all cases
Date: 8/9/2003 8:59:21 AM
Thanks for posting this regexp!
Title: WOW - ONE THAT WORKS
Date: 7/30/2003 10:43:22 AM
Too many posted regex's do not work.
AFter testing 12-15 posted regexes, this is the first that I have found that has passed ALL of my tests.
It may still fail some, but works better than any I have found so far.
Well done Dany!