Title: rtytry
Name: rtyrty
Date: 6/21/2012 7:18:46 AM
Comment:
tytryrty
Title: a problem with the pattern
Name: Giulio Di Gio Battista
Date: 11/12/2008 7:09:49 AM
Comment:
by using the .net RegEx if you give "Arnet1006522192MAI@INTERCHEMISTRY" as input the method IsMatch will hang indefinetely
Please let me know if you solve the problem
Regards,
Giulio Di Gio Battista (giulio211271@hotmail.com)
Title: does not with gmail "+"
Name: keshar
Date: 10/1/2008 2:22:17 PM
Comment:
gmail allows for the following:
account.name+whatever@gmail.com
This was my fix:
^[A-Za-z0-9](([_\.\-\+]?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*)@([A-Za-z0-9]+)(([\.\-]?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*)\.([A-Za-z]{2,})$
Title: Finally!
Name: Love to avoid work!
Date: 8/9/2007 10:54:59 AM
Comment:
Here's a regex that actually validates email addresses like this: x.xxxxx-xxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx. Took a long time to find one that did (I'm lazy)
Title: Short and mathces +, - and _
Name: Juan Manuel Caicedo
Date: 3/6/2005 1:37:11 PM
Comment:
I just fixed Chris' shorten regep to match +, - and _ (underscore)
^[\w](([_\.\-\+]?[\w]+)*)@([\w]+)(([\.-]?[\w]+)*)\.([A-Za-z]{2,})$
Title: fails on + too
Name: Lorrin
Date: 12/1/2004 5:50:34 PM
Comment:
user+suffix@domain.org fails to match.
Title: what do you think of that regex?
Name: Matthias
Date: 10/28/2004 8:09:03 PM
Comment:
^\w+([\.-]?\w+)*@(\w+(-?\w+)*\.)+[A-Za-z]{2,6}$
Title: underscore problem
Name: Jan
Date: 9/24/2004 3:07:56 AM
Comment:
Does not match valid e-mail addresses like some_-_user@somewhere.com oder someuser_@somewhere.com
Title: Runs Too Long
Name: titltn21
Date: 9/3/2004 6:03:14 PM
Comment:
Ran into an issue during testing. Performance took a major hit and actually took a box down.
Test Case Results:
Input a nonvalid email (only /w) and as the length grows so does the processing time as shown below. Testing this expression on www.regexlib.com produced similiar time outs.
Below are the time stamped results when looping each test expression.
NOW:[m].[s].[ms]
45.38.627 ...Processing Bad Email [11]ABCDE
45.38.697 ...Processing Bad Email [10]ABCDEABCDE
45.38.697 ...Processing Bad Email [9]ABCDEABCDEABCDE
45.38.707 ...Processing Bad Email [8]ABCDEABCDEABCDEABCDE
45.39.66 ...Processing Bad Email [7]ABCDEABCDEABCDEABCDEABCDE
45.50.561 ...Processing Bad Email [6]ABCDEABCDEABCDEABCDEABCDEABCDE
[Case 6 too minutes to execute. 52-45=7 min]
52.41.144 ...Processing Bad Email [5]AB.DE
52.41.144 ...Processing Bad Email [4]AB.DEAB.DE
52.41.144 ...Processing Bad Email [3]AB.DEAB.DEAB.DE
52.41.144 ...Processing Bad Email [2]AB.DEAB.DEAB.DEAB.DE
52.41.144 ...Proc
Title: How close is this to what is valid for the RFC?
Name: Pete
Date: 9/2/2004 1:21:48 PM
Comment:
How close is this to what is valid for the RFC for e-mail addresses?
(I think it may be RFC 822 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html but not sure - you know thw one I mean)?
Title: Das
Name: Anamitra
Date: 5/21/2004 3:10:53 AM
Comment:
The expression has worked fine for me
Title: rastas
Name: rastas
Date: 5/13/2004 4:09:30 PM
Comment:
good
Title: Amazing
Name: Saleem Mirza
Date: 1/13/2004 2:57:57 AM
Comment:
amazing
Title: Shorten this puppy...
Name: Chris
Date: 1/8/2004 7:40:39 PM
Comment:
This regex can be shortened a bit by replacing all [a-zA-Z0-9] (or variant thereof) with \w.
^[\w](([_\.-]?[\w]+)*)@([\w]+)(([\.-]?[\w]+)*)\.([A-Za-z]{2,})$
Title: limit number of characters
Name: limiting_field
Date: 12/29/2003 3:41:19 PM
Comment:
how do i limit this regexp to up to 10 characters in length? i tried
^([A-Za-z0-9](([_\.\-]?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*)@([A-Za-z0-9]+)(([\.\-]?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*)\.([A-Za-z]{2,})){0,10}$
and that didnt work
