Title: Small update
Name: Garrett Reid
Date: 5/19/2008 5:43:58 PM
Comment:
This will fix the small RFC compliance problem mentioned earlier:
[_a-zA-Z0-9-"'\/]+(\.[_a-zA-Z0-9-"'\/]+)*@[a-zA-Z0-9-]+(\.[a-zA-Z0-9-]+)*\.(([0-9]{1,3})|([a-zA-Z]{2,3})|(aero|coop|info|museum|name))
Title: Small update
Name: Garrett Reid
Date: 5/19/2008 5:43:58 PM
Comment:
This will fix the small RFC compliance problem mentioned earlier:
[_a-zA-Z0-9-"'\/]+(\.[_a-zA-Z0-9-"'\/]+)*@[a-zA-Z0-9-]+(\.[a-zA-Z0-9-]+)*\.(([0-9]{1,3})|([a-zA-Z]{2,3})|(aero|coop|info|museum|name))
Title: Small update
Name: Garrett Reid
Date: 5/19/2008 5:43:58 PM
Comment:
This will fix the small RFC compliance problem mentioned earlier:
[_a-zA-Z0-9-"'\/]+(\.[_a-zA-Z0-9-"'\/]+)*@[a-zA-Z0-9-]+(\.[a-zA-Z0-9-]+)*\.(([0-9]{1,3})|([a-zA-Z]{2,3})|(aero|coop|info|museum|name))
Title: Check out up-to-date TLDs
Name: Kivanc Anar
Date: 1/18/2008 3:20:15 PM
Comment:
http://data.iana.org/TLD/tlds-alpha-by-domain.txt
Title: RUNESCAPE
Name: NADEEM128
Date: 7/25/2007 3:36:50 AM
Comment:
I NEED BACK MY ACCOUNT,PLEAES
Title: RUNESCAPE
Name: NADEEM128
Date: 7/25/2007 3:35:43 AM
Comment:
I NEED BACK MY ACCOUNT,PLEAES
Title: i need 190 mil free
Name: king ryan379
Date: 3/13/2007 6:53:03 PM
Comment:
i need this to inpress my freinds
Title: Works on basic emails just fine
Name: LHD
Date: 11/30/2006 12:10:57 PM
Comment:
This using some of the standard emails in sue at a client's site and it works fine in all cases.
Title: Fails valid email addresses with + addressing
Name: Tim lesher
Date: 5/22/2006 2:56:04 PM
Comment:
This fails on the valid "plus-addressing" technique used by Gmail: foo+bar@baz.com
Title: Fails to match valid email address
Name: The Fred and Barney Comedy Team <fred&barney@stonehenge.com>
Date: 1/26/2005 3:41:42 AM
Comment:
Fails to match the valid email address
fred&barney@stonehenge.com
Title: only it doesn't work
Name: pinetree
Date: 6/16/2003 4:02:04 PM
Comment:
Except that per RFC 822 (http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc822/Overview.html), the following email addresses are valid but would be trapped as invalid by this code. Specifically, look at Appendix A (http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc822/Overview.html#z10), section A.3.3.<br><br>
"Some Silly User"@example.com<br>
Another'User@example.com<br>
Yet/Another/Wacky/User@example.com
